直播吧07月31日讯 FIFA通过官方社媒，对成立子公司“国际足联前进企业”（FFE），以及媒体对FIFA相关商业运作的报道进行了回应。         Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi attends a Nagasaki Peace Ceremony to commemorate the 81st anniversary of the atomic bombing at the Peace Park in Nagasaki City on August 9, 2026. Photo: VCGJapanese officials and members of the public urged the government to uphold the Three Non-Nuclear principles and pursue a security policy that does not rely on nuclear weapons, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi maintained an ambiguous stance on the long-held policy during a speech on Sunday marking the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki.
Chinese experts noted that, similar to her ambiguous remarks at the memorial ceremony in Hiroshima, Takaichi stopped short of making a clear commitment to maintaining the Three Non-Nuclear Principles in the future, as her government's stance on nuclear issues has sparked concern and anger among the Japanese public. They also warned that, given Japan's lack of thorough reflection on its wartime aggression, Tokyo's moves to dilute the Three Non-Nuclear Principles should raise alarm across the international community.
"Our country firmly upholds the three non-nuclear principles, and under the pledge that 'Nagasaki shall be the last city to suffer a nuclear attack,' we are promoting realistic and practical initiatives toward the realization of a world without nuclear weapons," Takaichi claimed, according to the Japan Times. 
But unlike previous prime ministers, many of whom had pledged that Japan would "continue to uphold" the principles, Takaichi merely described the government's current position without making an explicit commitment about the future, per the report.
As Hiroshima observed the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the city on Thursday, Takaichi also emphasized that Japan pledges to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons while upholding the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, despite Japanese media noting that she has left the door open for future revisions.
Takaichi's remarks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki that Japan upholds the three non-nuclear principles were largely seen as a reaffirmation of the country's existing policy position rather than a pledge to maintain the principles in the future, Liu Jiangyong, a professor at the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University, told the Global Times. 
Liu said that currently, some Japanese officials' dangerous remarks on nuclear have sparked criticism among Japanese society. He pointed out that Takaichi only referred to Japan's current adherence to the principles, without explicitly committing to preserving them going forward. Her subsequent focus on broader goals such as achieving a "world without nuclear weapons" has further fueled questions over her actual policy intentions.
Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi claimed in an online program released in July that discussions on nuclear weapons were necessary to strengthen Japan's defense capabilities, according to Kyodo News. While acknowledging that the issue was difficult to discuss in Japan, he claimed it was something that "could not be avoided." 
Opposition to the Takaichi administration's nuclear-related moves has emerged across Japan, including from local governments, media organizations and civil society groups.
According to statistics from the Japanese Diet, at least 128 local assemblies across the country had submitted written opinions to the central government or parliament between Takaichi's inauguration on October 21 last year and July 28 this year, calling for the country's Three Non-Nuclear Principles to be upheld, according to Xinhua News Agency.
In an interview with the AFP, 82-year-old Satoshi Tanaka, a campaigner who survived the 1945 attack on Hiroshima expressed frustration that current political leaders like Takaichi are focusing on military capacity at the expense of diplomacy.
"There is so much talk about national security. What about building peace through diplomacy?" he said.
Responding to a question concerning the Japanese authorities are rebuilding Japan's war machine, seeking to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, and pursuing nuclear sharing with the US, even the possession of nuclear weapons, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Thursday that the devastation and tragedies brought by nuclear weapons should never repeat themselves. That said, the particular context of the nuclear explosions should all the more be remembered and the lessons of Japanese militarism's aggression and expansion must forever serve as an alarm.
The Tokyo's moves on nuclear policy have also raised concerns in the international community.
Russia considers the rhetoric of Japanese authorities regarding the need for Japan to revise its Three Non-Nuclear Principles provocative and unacceptable, Russian Ambassador to Japan Nikolai Nozdrev said in an interview with RIA Novosti, which was published on Saturday. 
Responding to Koizumi's remarks on nuclear discussion, Nozdrev said "This is the first time in Japan's history, as the only country to have suffered atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that a sitting defense minister has publicly called for lifting the 'taboo' on discussions related to nuclear weapons. We consider such rhetoric from official Tokyo provocative and absolutely unacceptable."
Japan has yet to fully reckon with its wartime aggression, thus any attempt by Tokyo to move toward acquiring nuclear weapons could pose serious risks to regional peace and global security, Lü Chao, an expert on the Korean Peninsula issue at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.
Such concerns have become more pronounced as Japan increasingly portrays China as a major security challenge while highlighting perceived threats from other countries, against such a backdrop, any further steps to dilute the three non-nuclear principles are likely to heighten concerns internationally, particularly among countries that suffered from Japanese aggression during World War II, said Lü.
。

二 | FIFA官方公告：国际足联承认并尊重公开表达的意见和关切。国际足联重申其对公开、民主协商程序的承诺。

三 | 媒体的错误报道干扰了原定的协商进程。我们已听取了各联合会就拟议成立的“国际足联前进企业”（FFE）所提出的反馈意见，并希望就周二首次媒体报道以来出现的问题作出说明。我们尊重公开表达的意见和关切，并重申我们对公开、民主协商程序的承诺。我们原定的协商进程因不正确的媒体报道而受到干扰。我们将继续推进这一协商进程，以确保每个会员协会都能基于事实表达其投票意愿。

四 | FFE的提议完全是为了确保所有国际足联会员协会都有机会在本国真正拥有足球商业机遇的主导权，并且这不会以牺牲国际足联或足球运动本身的精神或治理为代价。没有人要出售足球。

五 | 国际足联绝不会考虑这样做。每个人都有权表达反对意见并要求进一步澄清，但没有任何单一实体可以声称代表全球所有211个会员协会。每个会员协会都应被允许审查该提案，并在塑造自身未来方面拥有发言权。这是国际足联的民主原则。根据该提案：FFE将把国际足联的商业和赛事运营活动转移到一个由国际足联永久拥有和控制的子公司中。

六 | 所创造的商业价值将在所有211个会员协会之间共享，使每个会员协会都能在本国对足球进行有意义的投资。根据该提案，无论各会员协会是否支持，每个会员协会都将在未来四年（2027-2030年）内获得2000万美元的国际足联远期发展基金。这笔增加的资金将来自FFE通过更有效管理国际足联商业运营所产生的额外收入，惠及所有会员协会。“国际足联快进计划”是一项一次性发展资助，每个会员协会额外获得2000万美元——如果FFE提案继续推进，所有会员协会的参与完全是自愿的——该计划将由外部投资提供资金，且不会以任何方式放弃控制权或改变国际足联的治理结构。

七 | 如果没有大多数会员协会的支持，国际足联的商业活动将保持不变，FFE将不会成立。这些内容是协商进程的起点，并作为该进程的一部分开放讨论。讨论可包括整体或逐项批准、否决或修正。这些原则构成了FFE提案的基础：前所未有的发展资助、真正全球共享我们这项运动商业机遇的所有权，以及所有会员协会通过民主程序实现的完全自主决定权。国际足联在北京时间本周二官宣成立子公司“国际足联前进企业”（FFE），整合国际足联的转播、赞助、票务和特许经营等商业权益与赛事运营。

八 | 初始股权估值200亿美元，向全球引资，计划于今年晚些时候筹集最高42亿美元，并声称FFE产生的所有净收益将 100% 重新投资回全球足球运动。

九 | 但相关商业计划遭到多方反对，各地足协表态将否决相关提案。